URL = http://example.com,
Header = [],
Type = \"application/json\",
Content = \"我是中文\",
Body = lists:concat([\"{\\\"type\\\":\\\"0\\\",\\\"result\\\":[{\\\"url\\\":\\\"
You must take special care to ensure input is what you think it is because it may differ from what you expect.
This answer applies to the Erlang release that I'm running which is R16B03-1. I'll try to get all of the details in here so you can test with your own install and verify.
If you don't take specific action to change it, a string will be interpreted as follows:
TerminalContent = "我是中文",
TerminalContent = [25105,26159,20013,25991].
In the terminal the string is interpreted as a list of unicode characters.
BytewiseContent = "我是中文",
BytewiseContent = [230,136,145,230,152,175,228,184,173,230,150,135].
In a module, the default encoding is latin1
and strings containing unicode characters are interpreted bytewise
lists (of UTF8 bytes).
If you use data encoded like BytewiseContent
, unicode:characters_to_list/1
will double-encode the Chinese characters and ææ¯ä
will be sent to the server where you expected 我是中文
.
erl
command line, ensure it is setup to use unicode.bytewise
encoding to unicode before processing (this goes for binary data acquired using httpc:request/N
as well). If you embed unicode characters in your module, ensure that you indicate as much by commenting within the first two lines of your module:
%% -*- coding: utf-8 -*-
This will change the way the module interprets the string such that:
UnicodeContent = "我是中文",
UnicodeContent = [25105,26159,20013,25991].
Once you have ensured that you are concatenating characters and not bytes, the concatenation is safe. Don't use unicode:characters_to_list/1
to convert your string/list until the whole thing has been built up.
The following function works as expected when given a Url
and a list of unicode character Content
:
http_post_content(Url, Content) ->
ContentType = "application/json",
%% Concat the list of (character) lists
Body = lists:concat(["{\"content\":\"", Content, "\"}"]),
%% Explicitly encode to UTF8 before sending
UnicodeBin = unicode:characters_to_binary(Body),
httpc:request(post,
{
Url,
[], % HTTP headers
ContentType, % content-type
UnicodeBin % the body as binary (UTF8)
},
[], % HTTP Options
[{body_format,binary}] % indicate the body is already binary
).
To verify results I wrote the following HTTP server using node.js
and express
. The sole purpose of this dead-simple server is to sanity check the problem and solution.
var express = require('express'),
bodyParser = require('body-parser'),
util = require('util');
var app = express();
app.use(bodyParser());
app.get('/', function(req, res){
res.send('You probably want to perform an HTTP POST');
});
app.post('/', function(req, res){
util.log("body: "+util.inspect(req.body, false, 99));
res.json(req.body);
});
app.listen(3000);
Gist
Again in Erlang, the following function will check to ensure that the HTTP response contains the echoed JSON, and ensures the exact unicode characters were returned.
verify_response({ok, {{_, 200, _}, _, Response}}, SentContent) ->
%% use jiffy to decode the JSON response
{Props} = jiffy:decode(Response),
%% pull out the "content" property value
ContentBin = proplists:get_value(<<"content">>, Props),
%% convert the binary value to unicode characters,
%% it should equal what we sent.
case unicode:characters_to_list(ContentBin) of
SentContent -> ok;
Other ->
{error, [
{expected, SentContent},
{received, Other}
]}
end;
verify_response(Unexpected, _) ->
{error, {http_request_failed, Unexpected}}.
The complete example.erl module is posted in a Gist.
Once you've got the example module compiled and an echo server running you'll want to run something like this in an Erlang shell:
inets:start().
Url = example:url().
Content = example:content().
Response = example:http_post_content(Url, Content).
If you've got jiffy
set up you can also verify the content made the round trip:
example:verify_response(Response, Content).
You should now be able to confirm round-trip encoding of any unicode content.
While I explained the encodings above you will have noticed that TerminalContent
, BytewiseContent
, and UnicodeContent
are all lists of integers. You should endeavor to code in a manner that allows you to be certain what you have in hand.
The oddball encoding is bytewise
which may turn up when working with modules that are not "unicode aware". Erlang's guidance on working with unicode mentions this near the bottom under the heading Lists of UTF-8 Bytes. To translate bytewise
lists use:
%% from http://www.erlang.org/doc/apps/stdlib/unicode_usage.html
utf8_list_to_string(StrangeList) ->
unicode:characters_to_list(list_to_binary(StrangeList)).
As far as I know, I don't have local settings that modify Erlang's behavior. My Erlang is R16B03-1 built and distributed by Erlang Solutions, my machine runs OS X 10.9.2.