Difference between initializing a string with (char *)malloc(0) and NULL

Question

Why allocating a 0 size char block works in this case? But if I write char *string = NULL; it won\'t work.

I\'m using Visual Studio.

Answer 1

First let me state, as per the man page of malloc()

The malloc() function allocates size bytes and returns a pointer to the allocated memory. The memory is not initialized. If size is 0, then malloc() returns either NULL, or a unique pointer value that can later be successfully passed to free().

a call like malloc(0) is valid itself, but then, we need to check the validity of the returned pointer. It can either

• Return NULL
• Return a pointer which can be passed to free().

but anyways, dereferencing that pointer is not allowed. It will cause out-of-bound memory access and cause undefined behaviour.

That said, two important things to mention,

1. Please see why not to cast the return value of malloc() and family in C.

2. Please check the return value of malloc() before using the returned pointer.

So, to answer your question,

Difference between initializing a string with (char *)malloc(0) and NULL

Do not use malloc(0) in this case, as a NULL check on the pointer may fail, giving the wrong impression of a valid allocation of the memory to the pointer. Always use NULL for initialization.