I see the below document using 2 namespaces
**
Apple
The namespace URI is not used by the parser to look up information.
I think it should be sufficient for the URIs for the h and f namespaces you mentioned to simply be unique, valid URIs. In most examples, I've seen http used as the scheme name.
So, a perfectly valid namespace (that does not map to a valid website) could be:
xmlns:foo="http://my.example.ns"