I have this thread running :
def run(self):
while 1:
msg = self.connection.recv(1024).decode()
I wish I could end this thread
The only really satisfactory solution I've seen for this problem is not to allow your thread to block inside recv(). Instead, set the socket to non-blocking and have the thread block inside select() instead. The advantage of blocking inside select() is that you can tell select() to return when any one of several sockets becomes ready-for-read, which brings us to the next part: as part of setting up your thread, create a second socket (either a locally-connected TCP socket e.g. as provided by socketpair, or a UDP socket listening on a port for packets from localhost). When your main thread wants your networking thread to go away, your main thread should send a byte to that socket (or in the TCP case, the main thread could just close its end of the socket-pair). That will cause select() to return ready-for-read on that socket, and when your network thread realizes that the socket is marked ready-for-read, it should respond by exiting immediately.
The advantages of doing it that way are that it works well on all OS's, always reacts immediately (unlike a polling/timeout solution), takes up zero extra CPU cycles when the network is idle, and doesn't have any nasty side effects in multithreaded environments. The downside is that it uses up a couple of extra sockets, but that's usually not a big deal.