Lately, I\'ve been thinking a lot about the basis of Lisp; I\'ve read several manuals and/or other materials on the Internet, including The Roots of Lisp by P. Graham:
I am also relatively new to Lisp, but I think that what you were thinking about is eval
. eval
is the way to change data back to code.
Namely, consider a simple function.
(defun foo (a b c) (list a b c))
Then, if you do something like this, you get a list of symbols:
CL-USER> (foo 'a 'b 'c)
(A B C)
If you add a quote in the front, the function call itself is treated as a piece of data (list):
CL-USER> '(foo 'a 'b 'c)
(FOO 'A 'B 'C)
Adding one more quote has an expected effect:
CL-USER> ''(foo 'a 'b 'c)
'(FOO 'A 'B 'C)
Let us now unwind it with eval
, which in essence may be thought of as the inverse operation for the quote
. It is the inverse. The x-axis is the data form. The y-axis is the code form. Hopefully this (somewhat stretched) analogy makes sense.
CL-USER> (eval ''(foo 'a 'b 'c))
(FOO 'A 'B 'C)
Can you guess what will happen if I chain two eval
s in a row?
Here it is:
CL-USER> (eval (eval ''(foo 'a 'b 'c)))
(A B C)