I have a relation in PostgreSQL named product
which contains 2 fields: id
and quantity
, and I want to find the id
of the
The first query fails if any row has quantity IS NULL
(as Gordon demonstrates).
The second query only fails if all rows have quantity IS NULL
. So it should be usable in most cases. (And it's faster.)
If you need a NULL-safe query in Postgres 12 or older, i.e., NULL is a valid result, then consider:
SELECT id, quantity
FROM product
WHERE quantity IS NOT DISTINCT FROM (SELECT MAX(quantity) FROM product);
Or, probably faster:
SELECT id, quantity
FROM (
SELECT *, rank() OVER (ORDER BY quantity DESC NULLS LAST) AS rnk
FROM product
) sub
WHERE rnk = 1;
See:
Postgres 13 adds the standard SQL clause WITH TIES:
SELECT id
FROM product
ORDER BY quantity DESC NULLS LAST
FETCH FIRST 1 ROWS WITH TIES;
db<>fiddle here
Works with any amount of NULL
values.
The manual:
SQL:2008 introduced a different syntax to achieve the same result, which PostgreSQL also supports. It is:
OFFSET start { ROW | ROWS } FETCH { FIRST | NEXT } [ count ] { ROW | ROWS } { ONLY | WITH TIES }
In this syntax, the
start
orcount
value is required by the standard to be a literal constant, a parameter, or a variable name; as a PostgreSQL extension, other expressions are allowed, but will generally need to be enclosed in parentheses to avoid ambiguity. Ifcount
is omitted in aFETCH
clause, it defaults to 1. TheWITH TIES
option is used to return any additional rows that tie for the last place in the result set according to theORDER BY
clause;ORDER BY
is mandatory in this case.ROW
andROWS
as well asFIRST
andNEXT
are noise words that don't influence the effects of these clauses.
Notably, WITH TIES
cannot be used with the (non-standard) short syntax LIMIT n
.
It's the fastest possible solution. Faster than either of your current queries. More important for performance: have an index on (quantity)
. Or a more specialized covering index to allow index-only scans (a bit faster, yet):
CREATE INDEX ON product (quantity DESC NULLS LAST) INCLUDE (id);
See:
We need NULLS LAST
to keep NULL
values last in descending order. See: