Haskell - Capitalize all letters in a list [String] with toUpper

前端 未结 3 911
陌清茗
陌清茗 2021-01-14 17:04

I have a list [String] the task ist to remove those elements in the list, which have \"q\" or \"p\" and then capitalize all letters in the list with toUpper.

What I

3条回答
  •  梦毁少年i
    2021-01-14 17:38

    Mapping one level deeper

    You need to use map (map toUpper).

    This is because you have [String] instead of String.

    toUpper           :: Char -> Char
    map toUpper       :: [Char] -> [Char]
    

    i.e.

    map toUpper       :: String -> String
    map (map toUpper) :: [String] -> [String]
    

    map toUpper capitalises a String, by making each letter uppercase, so map (map toUpper) capitalises each String in a list of Strings.

    Your function becomes

    delAndUpper myList = map (map toUpper) (filter (\x -> not('p' `elem` x || 'q' `elem` x)) myList)
    

    dave4420 made a good suggestion that (map.map) toUpper is a neat way of writing map (map toUpper) that helps you think two list levels in quite simply and naturally - have a look at his answer too.

    Can we un-hardwire the p and q?

    You asked if there was a shorter way to write the condition, and didn't like hard coding the `q` and `p`. I agree those multiple `elem` bits aren't pretty. Let's pass in the list of disallowed letters and tidy up a bit:

    delAndUpper omit strings = map (map toUpper) (filter ok strings) where
                ok xs = not (any (`elem` omit) xs)
    

    Here (`elem` omit) checks a character if it's in the list of ones that would cause us to omit the word, so (any (`elem` omit) xs) checks if any of the characters of xs are forbidden. Of course if none are forbidden, it's ok.

    Your original delAndUpper would now be delAndUpper "pq", or if you also want to disallow capital P and Q, delAndUpper "pqPQ". (More on this later.)

    Can we make it more concise?

    Let's see if we can't write ok a little shorter. My first thought was to use pointfree on it (see my answer to another question for details of how to get it running in ghci), but it seemed to hang, so using some standard transformation tricks, we can compose not with a function that takes two arguments before giving us a Bool by doing (not.).f instead of not.f as we would with a function which just gave us a Bool after the first input. any is taking (`elem` omit) as its first argument. This gives us

    ok xs = ((not.).any) (`elem` omit) xs
    

    from which we can remove the trailing xs:

    ok = ((not.).any) (`elem` omit) 
    

    and inline:

    delAndUpper omit strings = map (map toUpper) (filter (((not.).any) (`elem` omit)) strings)
    

    I'm not keen on the trailing strings either:

    delAndUpper omit = map (map toUpper).filter (((not.).any) (`elem` omit))
    

    (We could get rid of the omit argument as well and go completely point free, but that would go quite a bit too far down the hard-to-read road for my taste.)

    Whither Q?

    > delAndUpper "pq" $ words "The Queen has probably never had a parking ticket."
    ["THE","QUEEN","HAS","NEVER","HAD","A","TICKET."]
    

    Is this the required behaviour? It seems strange to carefully exclude the lowercase variants and then make everything uppercase. We could do it the other way round:

    upperAndDel omit = filter (((not.).any) (`elem` omit)).map (map toUpper)
    

    giving

    > upperAndDel "PQ" $ words "The Queen has probably never had a parking ticket."
    ["THE","HAS","NEVER","HAD","A","TICKET."]
    

提交回复
热议问题