When compiling the following with the strict overflow flag, it tells me, on the 2nd test that r may not be what I think it could be:
int32_t r(my_rand())
EDIT: I removed my first answer, because it was invalid. Here is completely new version. Thanks to @Neil Kirk for pointing out my errors.
Answer for the question is here: https://stackoverflow.com/a/18521660/2468549
GCC always assumes, that signed overflow does never occur, and, on that assumption, it (always) optimizes out the inner if (r < 0)
block.
If you turn -Wstrict-overflow
on, then compiler finds out, that after r = -r
r < 0
may still be true (if r == -2^31
initially), which causes an error (error is caused by optimization based on assumption of overflow never occurring, not by overflow possibility itself - that's how -Wstrict-overflow
works).