Code first. This is what I\'m trying to do. I\'m close, but I think I just need to fix the way I\'ve defined my parameter in the UpdateButton method.
private
You need to pass this as a Task
, not an Action
.
This provides something that's "awaitable".
I believe this will work, given your current code:
private async Task UpdateButtonAsync(Task post)
{
if (!await post)
ErrorBox.Text = "Error posting message.";
}
// This will work if Post returns Task in the current API...
private void PostToTwitter()
{
UpdateButtonAsync(new TwitterAction().Post("Hello, world!"));
}
If you do not want to start the Task
immediately, and need to keep it as passing a lambda, there is still no reason for the lambda to be async. In that case, you could use:
private async Task UpdateButtonAsync(Func> post)
{
if (!await post())
ErrorBox.Text = "Error posting message.";
}
// This will work if Post returns Task in the current API...
private void PostToTwitter()
{
UpdateButtonAsync(() => new TwitterAction().Post("Hello, world!"));
}
This causes the lambda to return the Task
(no async
/await
required, as Post
already returns Task
), and the update method to run the lambda.
Personally, I find the first option (above) simpler, and suspect it is more likely what you want. Given your API already returns Task
, you can just pass that around and await
it directly.