Are these codes logically equivalent?
And
Here’s my interpretation of the specs. Update: After looking at the HTML4 specs, I’ve changed my mind about the colgroup
element's span
attribute.
(This is also in response to my own 2nd question comment in @mu’s answer.)
A colgroup
represents a group of one or more columns, and its span
specifies the number of columns in a column group. So I think of it as a shortcut, saving the author from writing multiple col
elements in succession.
The column group spans over three columns and is styled according to the CSS rule .x {...}
. This is equivalent to
On the other hand, col
represents one or more columns in the column group, and its span
specifies the number of columns "spanned" by the COL element… which is a cyclical definition if you ask me.
The only way I can interpret this is that by writing
you’re saying there are three columns, each in the same logical grouping, styled the same way according to .y {...}
. This is a shortcut to writing
Presentationally, I’m not sure there would be a noticeable difference. How it all looks depends on your CSS of course. But semantically, they are very different. The first example represents three groups of columns with each group containing one column, whereas the second example represents one group of three columns.
After rethinking this, I’ve decided that they’re both the same. Having a colgroup
span n
number of columns is the same as having one colgroup
with a col
child that spans n
columns. There is no logical or semantic difference in my opinion.
Note: the col element must be contained in a colgroup element that has no span attribute. It may not be a direct child of the table element.