Forgive my terribly-worded question but here\'s some code to explain what I\'m trying to do (slug
and value
are provided outside this query):
When thinking in terms of GraphQL, it's important to remember that each field for a given type is resolved by GraphQL simultaneously.
For example, when your post
query returns a Post
type, GraphQL will resolve the content
and createdAt
fields at the same time. Once those fields are resolved, it moved on to the next "level" of the query (for example, if content
returned a type instead of a scalar, it would then try to resolve those fields.
Each of your individual queries (post
, reply
, and user
) are actually fields of the Root Query type, and the same logic applies to them as well. That means there's no way to reference the id returned by post
within reply
-- both queries will be fired off at the same time.
An exception to the above exists in the form of mutations, which are actually resolved sequentially instead of simultaneously. That means, even though you still wouldn't be able to use the result of post
as a variable inside your reply
query, you could use context to pass the id from one to the other if both were mutations. This, however, is very hackish and requires the client to request the mutations in a specific order.
A more viable solution would be to simply handle this on the client side by breaking it up into two requests, and waiting to fire the second until the first one returns.
Lastly, you may consider reworking your schema to prevent having to have multiple queries in the first place. For example, your Post type could simply have a replies
field that would resolve to all replies that correspond with the returned post's id.