I\'ve read some article about String.Empty vs \"\" and I also do test by my self. Different between them are below.
String.Empty
L_0001: ldsfld strin
The ldsfld
operation pushes the value of a static field onto the evaluation stack, while the ldstr
pushes a reference to a meta data string literal.
The performance difference (if any) would be minimal. Newer versions of the compiler actually substitutes ""
for String.Empty
.
You should also consider the readability and maintainability of the code. Using String.Empty
it's clearer that you actually mean an empty string and not just forgot to type something in the string literal.
I took a look at the native code created.
C# 3, release mode, x86:
string a = String.Empty;
0000002a mov eax,dword ptr ds:[0356102Ch]
0000002f mov dword ptr [ebp-8],eax
string b = "";
00000032 mov eax,dword ptr ds:[0356202Ch]
00000038 mov dword ptr [ebp-0Ch],eax
C# 3, release mode, x64:
string a = String.Empty;
0000003b mov rax,12711050h
00000045 mov rax,qword ptr [rax]
00000048 mov qword ptr [rsp+28h],rax
string b = "";
0000004d mov rax,12713048h
00000057 mov rax,qword ptr [rax]
0000005a mov qword ptr [rsp+30h],rax
So, in the end the code is identical.