if condition with nullable

Question

There is a lot of syntax sugar with Nullable like those:

int? parsed to Nullable

int? x = null
   if (x != null) // Parsed          


        

Answer 1

It's the most obvious usage for Nullable

Your "obvious" behaviour leads to many inobvious behaviours.

If

if(x)

is treated as false when x is null, then what should happen to

if(!x)

? !x is also null when x is null, and therefore will be treated as false also! Does it not seem strange that you cannot reverse the behaviour of a conditional with an inversion?

What about

if (x | !x)

Surely that should always be true, but if x is null then the whole expression is null, and therefore false.

It is better to avoid these inobvious situations by simply making them all illegal. C# is a "make the user say what they mean unambiguously" language.

I believe that VB has the behaviour you want. You might consider switching to VB if this is the sort of thing you like.