H i,
Hoping you can help.
Is there a way for LESS to return just a value - feel like I\'m missing something very obvious
Sa
LESS has no way as of yet to create a true "function," so we cope with it.
You can just use the unit function, like so:
LESS
.someClass { padding: unit(@basevalue, @unit); }
.someOtherClass { padding: unit(@basevalue*0.5, @unit); }
CSS
.someClass {
padding: 1em;
}
.someOtherClass {
padding: 0.5em;
}
The mixins as functions is okay in some situations, but as you discovered, has the limitation of only setting the value once on the first call (and that is assuming a variable of the same name does not exist in that scope already).
LESS (first works right, second doesn't)
.returnUnit(@val:1) {
@return: unit(@basevalue*@val, @unit);
}
.someThirdClass {
.returnUnit(0.4);
padding: @return;
}
.someOoopsClass {
.returnUnit(0.4);
padding: @return;
.returnUnit(0.3);
margin: @return;
}
CSS Output
.someThirdClass {
padding: 0.4em;
}
.someOoopsClass {
padding: 0.4em;
margin: 0.4em; /* Ooops! Not 0.3em! */
}
Limitation of the Second idea can be avoided by a second wrapping, as it isolates the scope for each variable returned by .returnUnit()
, like so:
LESS
.someAccurateClass {
& {
.returnUnit(0.4);
padding: @return;
}
& {
.returnUnit(0.3);
margin: @return;
}
}
CSS Output
.someAccurateClass {
padding: 0.4em;
margin: 0.3em; /* Yes! */
}
It may be better to merge ideas from the First and Third by adding some global variables and doing this:
LESS
@unit:em;
@basevalue:1;
@val: 1;
@setUnit: unit(@basevalue*@val, @unit);
.someAwesomeClass {
& {
@val: .2;
padding: @setUnit;
}
& {
@val: .1;
margin: @setUnit;
}
}
CSS Output
.someAwesomeClass {
padding: 0.2em;
margin: 0.1em;
}
So here we are using the unit
function still as the First idea, but have assigned it to the variable @setUnit
, so each time the variable is called, it runs the function. We still isolate our property blocks using the & {}
syntax like in the Third solution, but now we just set the @val
to what we want and call the @setUnit
where we want.