I am wondering about this because of scope issues. For example, consider the code
typedef struct {
int x1;/*top*/
int x2;/*bottom*/
int id;
} sub
Yes, in that case there will be a copy made. If you change the function declaration like this:
subline_t &subline(int x1, int x2, int id) {
then no copy will be made. However, in your specific case it would not be valid to return a reference to an object allocated on the stack. The problem is that the object would be destructed and invalidated before the caller had a chance to use it.
This is related to the common Return Value Optimization for C++ that can avoid doing an actual copy operation in the case you have described. The end result is (or should be) the same as if a copy were done, but you should be aware of the optimization. The presence of this optimization can, in some cases, change the observable behaviour of the program.