The internal class
scope overrides the public MyClass()
constructor scope, making the constructor internal
.
Using public
on the constructor makes it easier to update the class to public
later, but confuses intent. I don't do it.
Edit 3: I missed part of your question. It is still fine to do that if your class is nested. The nesting can't make any difference, even if it is nested in a private class in a public class in a ... (see C# language specification - 3.5.2 Accessibility domains).
EDIT: And, if i recall, if the ctor is internal
, it can't be used as a generic type where there is a constraint requiring where T : new()
, this would require a public
constructor (ref. C# language specification (version 4.0) - 4.4.3 Bound and unbound types).
Edit 2: Code sample demonstrating the above
class Program
{
internal class InternalClass {
internal InternalClass() { }
}
internal class InternalClassPublicCtor {
public InternalClassPublicCtor() { }
}
internal class GenericClass
where T : new() {}
static void Main(string[] args) {
GenericClass doesNotCompile = new GenericClass();
GenericClass doesCompile = new GenericClass();
}
}