GPX parsing patterns and “standards”

Question

I would like to continue the discussion from this post: GPX Schema validation problems. To go directly to the point, I want to ask how people are parsing and working with GP

Answer 1

In my applications I'm using a normal XML parser (e.g. pythons xml.dom.minidom) I'm just using the tag names to access the information I need. As it was mentioned in the other Thread, the thing that makes validation fail is the in the GPX standard definition. While it's true that GPX producing devices should respect the standard, it's actually not that big of a deal on the parsing side (at least with the GPX Files/Devices I worked on).

If a GPX file contains additional information then it will be dropped (unless you chose to extract the tagnames unknown to you).

If this method fails because the file is not vaild XML or the GPX uses different tag names for e.g. lat lon information there is no other way to read the file than to write a special importer for this specific use case (I have not seen such files, except for corrupted ones, in the wild)