If you want to preserve setTimeOut (instead of setInterval) and use named function (instead of evaluating code block in setTimeOut call), then this could be helpful:
var b = {
textScroller: document.getElementById('textScroller'),
text: "Hello how are you?"
};
function initText() {
for(c = 0; c < b.text.length; c++) {
setTimeout("append("+c+")", 1000 + c*200);
}
}
function append(c) {
b.textScroller.innerHTML += b.text[c];
}
window.onload = initText;
With the above you can pass a parameter to append function.
To pass several parameters the next code does the trick:
var glo = [];
function initText()
{
var textScroller = document.getElementById('textScroller');
var text = "Hello how are you?";
var timeout_time;
for(c = 0; c < text.length; c++) {
glo[glo.length] = {text:text, c:c, textScroller:textScroller};
timeout_time = 1000 + c * 200;
setTimeout("append(" + (glo.length - 1) + ")", timeout_time);
}
}
function append(i)
{
var obj = glo[i];
obj.textScroller.innerHTML += obj.text[obj.c];
obj = null;
glo[i] = null;
}
window.onload = initText;
With the above you have only one global array glo. In loop you create new array members to glo and in append() function refer to these members using index which is passed as parameter.
CAUTION: the second code sample is not meant as best or most suitable solution to OP:s problem, but may benefit in other setTimeOut relative problems, eg. when someone wants to make a presentation or performance test where some functionalities are needed to call after some delay. The advantage of this code is to make use of for loops (many coders want to use for loops) and the possibility to use also inner loops and the ability to "send" local variables in their loop time state to timeOut functions.
