How does a generic constraint prevent boxing of a value type with an implicitly implemented interface?

前端 未结 5 1976
南笙
南笙 2020-12-08 12:12

My question is somewhat related to this one: Explicitly implemented interface and generic constraint.

My question, however, is how the compiler enables a ge

5条回答
  •  囚心锁ツ
    2020-12-08 12:16

    My question, however, is how the compiler enables a generic constraint to eliminate the need for boxing a value type that explicitly implements an interface.

    By "the compiler" it is not clear whether you mean the jitter or the C# compiler. The C# compiler does so by emitting the constrained prefix on the virtual call. See the documentation of the constrained prefix for details.

    What is going on with the behind-the-scenes CLR implementation that requires a value type to be boxed when accessing an explicitly implemented interface member

    Whether the method being invoked is an explicitly implemented interface member or not is not particularly relevant. A more general question would be why does any virtual call require the value type to be boxed?

    One traditionally thinks of a virtual call as being an indirect invocation of a method pointer in a virtual function table. That's not exactly how interface invocations work in the CLR, but it's a reasonable mental model for the purposes of this discussion.

    If that's how a virtual method is going to be invoked then where does the vtable come from? The value type doesn't have a vtable in it. The value type just has its value in its storage. Boxing creates a reference to an object that has a vtable set up to point to all the value type's virtual methods. (Again, I caution you that this is not exactly how interface invocations work, but it is a good way to think about it.)

    What happens with a generic constraint that removes this requirement?

    The jitter is going to be generating fresh code for each different value type argument construction of the generic method. If you're going to be generating fresh code for each different value type then you can tailor that code to that specific value type. Which means that you don't have to build a vtable and then look up what the contents of the vtable are! You know what the contents of the vtable are going to be, so just generate the code to invoke the method directly.

提交回复
热议问题