Is if( a < 901 )
faster than if( a <= 900 )
.
Not exactly as in this simple example, but there are slight performance changes on loop
Only if the people who created the computers are bad with boolean logic. Which they shouldn't be.
Every comparison (>=
<=
>
<
) can be done in the same speed.
What every comparison is, is just a subtraction (the difference) and seeing if it's positive/negative.
(If the msb
is set, the number is negative)
How to check a >= b
? Sub a-b >= 0
Check if a-b
is positive.
How to check a <= b
? Sub 0 <= b-a
Check if b-a
is positive.
How to check a < b
? Sub a-b < 0
Check if a-b
is negative.
How to check a > b
? Sub 0 > b-a
Check if b-a
is negative.
Simply put, the computer can just do this underneath the hood for the given op:
a >= b
== msb(a-b)==0
a <= b
== msb(b-a)==0
a > b
== msb(b-a)==1
a < b
== msb(a-b)==1
and of course the computer wouldn't actually need to do the ==0
or ==1
either.
for the ==0
it could just invert the msb
from the circuit.
Anyway, they most certainly wouldn't have made a >= b
be calculated as a>b || a==b
lol