The question is in Java why can\'t I define an abstract static method? for example
abstract class foo {
abstract void bar( ); // <-- this is ok
ab
The abstract
annotation to a method indicates that the method MUST be overriden in a subclass.
In Java, a static
member (method or field) cannot be overridden by subclasses (this is not necessarily true in other object oriented languages, see SmallTalk.) A static
member may be hidden, but that is fundamentally different than overridden.
Since static members cannot be overriden in a subclass, the abstract
annotation cannot be applied to them.
As an aside - other languages do support static inheritance, just like instance inheritance. From a syntax perspective, those languages usually require the class name to be included in the statement. For example, in Java, assuming you are writing code in ClassA, these are equivalent statements (if methodA() is a static method, and there is no instance method with the same signature):
ClassA.methodA();
and
methodA();
In SmallTalk, the class name is not optional, so the syntax is (note that SmallTalk does not use the . to separate the "subject" and the "verb", but instead uses it as the statemend terminator):
ClassA methodA.
Because the class name is always required, the correct "version" of the method can always be determined by traversing the class hierarchy. For what it's worth, I do occasionally miss static
inheritance, and was bitten by the lack of static inheritance in Java when I first started with it. Additionally, SmallTalk is duck-typed (and thus doesn't support program-by-contract.) Thus, it has no abstract
modifier for class members.