I am a bit confused about the meaning of a Maven Snapshot and why we build one?
I'd like to make a point about terminology. The other answers gave good explanations about what a "snapshot" version is in the context of Maven. But does it follow that a non-snapshot version should be termed a "release" version?
There is some tension between the semantic versioning idea of a "release" version, which would seem to be any version that does not have a qualifier such as -SNAPSHOT
but also does not have a qualifier such as -beta.4
; and Maven's idea idea of a "release" version, which only seems to include the absence of -SNAPSHOT
.
In other words, there is a semantic ambiguity of whether "release" means "we can release it to Maven Central" or "the software is in its final release to the public". We could consider -beta.4
to be a "release" version if we release it to the public, but it's not a "final release". Semantic versioning clearly says that something like -beta.4
is a "pre-release" version, so it wouldn't make sense for it to be called a "release" version, even without -SNAPSHOT
. In fact by definition even -rc.5
is a release candidate, not an actual release, even though we may allow public access for testing.
So Maven notwithstanding, in my opinion it seems more appropriate only to call a "release" version one that doesn't have any qualifier at all, not even -beta.4
. Perhaps a better name for a Maven non-snapshot version would be a "stable" version (inspired by another answer). Thus we would have:
1.2.3-beta.4-SNAPSHOT
: A snapshot version of a pre-release version.1.2.3-SNAPSHOT
: A snapshot version of a release version.1.2.3-beta.4
: A stable version of a pre-release version.1.2.3
: A release version (which is a stable, non-snapshot version, obviously).