I came across some Java code that had the following structure:
public MyParameterizedFunction(String param1, int param2)
{
this(param1, param2, false);
}
Unfortunately, yes.
void MyParameterizedFunction(String param1, int param2, bool param3=false) {}
could be written in Java 1.5 as:
void MyParameterizedFunction(String param1, int param2, Boolean... params) {
assert params.length <= 1;
bool param3 = params.length > 0 ? params[0].booleanValue() : false;
}
But whether or not you should depend on how you feel about the compiler generating a
new Boolean[]{}
for each call.
For multiple defaultable parameters:
void MyParameterizedFunction(String param1, int param2, bool param3=false, int param4=42) {}
could be written in Java 1.5 as:
void MyParameterizedFunction(String param1, int param2, Object... p) {
int l = p.length;
assert l <= 2;
assert l < 1 || Boolean.class.isInstance(p[0]);
assert l < 2 || Integer.class.isInstance(p[1]);
bool param3 = l > 0 && p[0] != null ? ((Boolean)p[0]).booleanValue() : false;
int param4 = l > 1 && p[1] != null ? ((Integer)p[1]).intValue() : 42;
}
This matches C++ syntax, which only allows defaulted parameters at the end of the parameter list.
Beyond syntax, there is a difference where this has run time type checking for passed defaultable parameters and C++ type checks them during compile.