Invalidating JSON Web Tokens

前端 未结 28 2389
夕颜
夕颜 2020-11-22 06:17

For a new node.js project I\'m working on, I\'m thinking about switching over from a cookie based session approach (by this, I mean, storing an id to a key-value store conta

28条回答
  •  有刺的猬
    2020-11-22 06:56

    USING REFRESHING OF JWT...

    An approach that I take as being practical is to store a refresh token (which can be a GUID) and a counterpart refresh token ID (that does not change no matter how many refreshes are done) on the database and add them as claims for the user when the user's JWT is being generated. An alternative to a database can be used, e.g. memory cache. But I'm using database in this answer.

    Then, create a JWT refresh Web API endpoint that the client can call before the expiry of the JWT. When the refresh is called, get the refresh token from the claims in the JWT.

    On any call to the JWT refresh endpoint, validate the current refresh token and the refresh token ID as a pair on the database. Generate a new refresh token, and use it to replace the old refresh token on the database, using the refresh token ID. Remember they are claims that can be extracted from the JWT

    Extract the user's claims from the current JWT. Begin the process of generating a new JWT. Replace the value of the old refresh token claim with the newly generated refresh token that has also been newly saved on the database. With all that, generate the new JWT and send it to the client.

    So, after a refresh token has been used, whether by the intended user or an attacker, any other attempt to use a/the refresh token, that is not paired, on the database, with its refresh token ID, would not lead to the generation of a new JWT, hence preventing any client having that refresh token ID from being able to use the backend anymore, leading to a full logout of such clients (including the legitimate client).

    That explains the basic information.

    The next thing to add to that is to have a window for when a JWT can be refreshed, such that anything outside that window would be a suspicious activity. For example, the window can be 10min before the expiration of a JWT. The date-time a JWT was generated can be saved as a claim in that JWT itself. And when such suspicious activity occurs, i.e. when someone else tries to reuse that refresh token ID outside or within the window after it has already been used within the window, should mark the refresh token ID as invalid. Hence, even the valid owner of the refresh token ID would have to log in afresh.

    A refresh token that can't be found to be paired, on the database, with a presented refresh token ID implies that the refresh token ID should be invalidated. Because an idle user may try to use a refresh token that an attacker, for example, has already used.

    A JWT that was stolen and used by an attacker, before the intended user does, would be marked as invalid too when the user attempts to use the refresh token too, as explained earlier.

    The only situation not covered is if a client never attempts to refresh its JWT even after an attacker may have already stolen it. But this is unlikely to happen to a client that's not in custody (or something similar) of an attacker, meaning that the client cannot be predicted by the attacker as regards when the client would stop using the backend.

    If the client initiates a usual logout. The logout should be made to delete the refresh token ID and associated records from the database, hence, preventing any client from generating a refresh JWT.

提交回复
热议问题