How to define operator<
on n-tuple (for example on 3-tuple) so that it satisfy strict weak ordering concept ? I know that boost library has
if (a1 < b1)
return true;
if (b1 < a1)
return false;
// a1==b1: continue with element 2
if (a2 < b2)
return true;
if (b2 < a2)
return false;
// a2 == b2: continue with element 3
if (a3 < b3)
return true;
return false; // early out
This orders the elements by a1 being most siginificant and a3 least significant.
This can be continued ad infinitum, you could also e.g. apply it to a vector of T, iterating over comparisons of a[i] < a[i+1] / a[i+1] < a[i]. An alternate expression of the algorithm would be "skip while equal, then compare":
while (i
Of course, if the comparison is expensive, you might want to cache the comparison result.
[edit] removed wrong code
[edit] if more than just operator<
is available, I tend to use the pattern
if (a1 != b1)
return a1 < b1;
if (a2 != b2)
return a2 < b2;
...