I was told that +=
can have different effects than the standard notation of i = i +
. Is there a case in which i += 1
would be differen
Under the covers, i += 1
does something like this:
try:
i = i.__iadd__(1)
except AttributeError:
i = i.__add__(1)
While i = i + 1
does something like this:
i = i.__add__(1)
This is a slight oversimplification, but you get the idea: Python gives types a way to handle +=
specially, by creating an __iadd__
method as well as an __add__
.
The intention is that mutable types, like list
, will mutate themselves in __iadd__
(and then return self
, unless you're doing something very tricky), while immutable types, like int
, will just not implement it.
For example:
>>> l1 = []
>>> l2 = l1
>>> l1 += [3]
>>> l2
[3]
Because l2
is the same object as l1
, and you mutated l1
, you also mutated l2
.
But:
>>> l1 = []
>>> l2 = l1
>>> l1 = l1 + [3]
>>> l2
[]
Here, you didn't mutate l1
; instead, you created a new list, l1 + [3]
, and rebound the name l1
to point at it, leaving l2
pointing at the original list.
(In the +=
version, you were also rebinding l1
, it's just that in that case you were rebinding it to the same list
it was already bound to, so you can usually ignore that part.)