I have a small utility that I use to download an MP3 file from a website on a schedule and then builds/updates a podcast XML file which I\'ve added to iTunes.
The te
If speed matters to you, I made a small performance test for the modules urllib
and wget
, and regarding wget
I tried once with status bar and once without. I took three different 500MB files to test with (different files- to eliminate the chance that there is some caching going on under the hood). Tested on debian machine, with python2.
First, these are the results (they are similar in different runs):
$ python wget_test.py
urlretrive_test : starting
urlretrive_test : 6.56
==============
wget_no_bar_test : starting
wget_no_bar_test : 7.20
==============
wget_with_bar_test : starting
100% [......................................................................] 541335552 / 541335552
wget_with_bar_test : 50.49
==============
The way I performed the test is using "profile" decorator. This is the full code:
import wget
import urllib
import time
from functools import wraps
def profile(func):
@wraps(func)
def inner(*args):
print func.__name__, ": starting"
start = time.time()
ret = func(*args)
end = time.time()
print func.__name__, ": {:.2f}".format(end - start)
return ret
return inner
url1 = 'http://host.com/500a.iso'
url2 = 'http://host.com/500b.iso'
url3 = 'http://host.com/500c.iso'
def do_nothing(*args):
pass
@profile
def urlretrive_test(url):
return urllib.urlretrieve(url)
@profile
def wget_no_bar_test(url):
return wget.download(url, out='/tmp/', bar=do_nothing)
@profile
def wget_with_bar_test(url):
return wget.download(url, out='/tmp/')
urlretrive_test(url1)
print '=============='
time.sleep(1)
wget_no_bar_test(url2)
print '=============='
time.sleep(1)
wget_with_bar_test(url3)
print '=============='
time.sleep(1)
urllib
seems to be the fastest