What are the differences between these two code fragments?
Using type()
:
import types
if type(a) is types.DictType:
do_something(
For the real differences, we can find it in code
, but I can't find the implement of the default behavior of the isinstance()
.
However we can get the similar one abc.__instancecheck__ according to __instancecheck__.
From above abc.__instancecheck__
, after using test below:
# file tree
# /test/__init__.py
# /test/aaa/__init__.py
# /test/aaa/aa.py
class b():
pass
# /test/aaa/a.py
import sys
sys.path.append('/test')
from aaa.aa import b
from aa import b as c
d = b()
print(b, c, d.__class__)
for i in [b, c, object]:
print(i, '__subclasses__', i.__subclasses__())
print(i, '__mro__', i.__mro__)
print(i, '__subclasshook__', i.__subclasshook__(d.__class__))
print(i, '__subclasshook__', i.__subclasshook__(type(d)))
print(isinstance(d, b))
print(isinstance(d, c))
__subclasses__ []
__mro__ (, )
__subclasshook__ NotImplemented
__subclasshook__ NotImplemented
__subclasses__ []
__mro__ (, )
__subclasshook__ NotImplemented
__subclasshook__ NotImplemented
__subclasses__ [..., , ]
__mro__ (,)
__subclasshook__ NotImplemented
__subclasshook__ NotImplemented
True
False
I get this conclusion,
For type
:
# according to `abc.__instancecheck__`, they are maybe different! I have not found negative one
type(INSTANCE) ~= INSTANCE.__class__
type(CLASS) ~= CLASS.__class__
For isinstance
:
# guess from `abc.__instancecheck__`
return any(c in cls.__mro__ or c in cls.__subclasses__ or cls.__subclasshook__(c) for c in {INSTANCE.__class__, type(INSTANCE)})
BTW: better not to mix use relative and absolutely import
, use absolutely import
from project_dir( added by sys.path
)