Are implicit operators and TypeConverters equivalent?

Question

It seems to me its very easy to implement an implicit operator versus a TypeConverter, so I\'m assuming they aren\'t equivalent because of the prevalence of TypeConverters in th

Answer 1

I am no expert on this.

But at first glance, it looks like - you can provide converters outside of the original class (as against implicit operator) & maybe you can define multiple TypeConverter classes for a same thing (if you want to get different views for the same value).