C++ 'overloading' the if() statement

前端 未结 2 1702
长情又很酷
长情又很酷 2021-02-19 20:14

Is it possible to change the behavior of if() so that:

class Foo {
    int x;
};

Foo foo;
if(foo)

only proceeds if the value of <

2条回答
  •  暖寄归人
    2021-02-19 20:40

    You can define an operator to convert the object to bool

    class Foo
    {
      int x;
    public:
      operator bool() const
      {
        return x > 0;
      }
    };
    

    But this can have unintended consequences because of implicit conversions to bool when you don't desire the conversion to take place. For instance

    int x = 42 + Foo();
    

    C++11 solves this problem by allowing you to declare the conversion operator as explicit, which then only allows implicit conversions in certain contexts, such as within an if statement.

    explicit operator bool() const // allowed in C++11
    

    Now

    int x = 42 + Foo();  // error, no implicit conversion to bool
    int x = 42 + static_cast(Foo()); // OK, explicit conversion is allowed
    

提交回复
热议问题