This issue is one of the first things most of us experience, when transitioning from the React.createClass() component definition syntax to the ES6 class way of extending React.Component.
It is caused by the this context differences in React.createClass() vs extends React.Component.
Using React.createClass() will automatically bind this context (values) correctly, but that is not the case when using ES6 classes. When doing it the ES6 way (by extending React.Component) the this context is null by default. Properties of the class do not automatically bind to the React class (component) instance.
Approaches to Solve this Issue
I know a total of 4 general approaches.
Bind your functions in the class constructor. Considered by many as a best-practice approach that avoids touching JSX at all and doesn't create a new function on each component re-render.
class SomeClass extends React.Component {
constructor(props) {
super(props);
this.handleClick = this.handleClick.bind(this);
}
handleClick() {
console.log(this); // the React Component instance
}
render() {
return (
);
}
}
Bind your functions inline. You can still find this approach used here and there in some tutorials / articles / etc, so it's important you're aware of it. It it the same concept like #1, but be aware that binding a function creates a new function per each re-render.
class SomeClass extends React.Component {
handleClick() {
console.log(this); // the React Component instance
}
render() {
return (
);
}
}
Use a fat arrow function. Until arrow functions, every new function defined its own this value. However, the arrow function does not create its own this context, so this has the original meaning from the React component instance. Therefore, we can:
class SomeClass extends React.Component {
handleClick() {
console.log(this); // the React Component instance
}
render() {
return (
);
}
}
or
class SomeClass extends React.Component {
handleClick = () => {
console.log(this); // the React Component instance
}
render() {
return (
);
}
}
Use utility function library to automatically bind your functions. There are a few utility libraries out there, that automatically does the job for you. Here are some of the popular, just to mention a few:
Autobind Decorator is an NPM package which binds methods of a class to the correct instance of this, even when the methods are detached. The package uses @autobind before methods to bind this to the correct reference to the component's context.
import autobind from 'autobind-decorator';
class SomeClass extends React.Component {
@autobind
handleClick() {
console.log(this); // the React Component instance
}
render() {
return (
);
}
}
Autobind Decorator is smart enough to let us bind all methods inside a component class at once, just like approach #1.
Class Autobind is another NPM package that is widely used to solve this binding issue. Unlike Autobind Decorator, it does not use of the decorator pattern, but really just uses a function inside your constructor that automatically binds the Component's methods to the correct reference of this.
import autobind from 'class-autobind';
class SomeClass extends React.Component {
constructor() {
autobind(this);
// or if you want to bind only only select functions:
// autobind(this, 'handleClick');
}
handleClick() {
console.log(this); // the React Component instance
}
render() {
return (
);
}
}
PS: Other very similar library is React Autobind.
Recommendation
If I were you, I would stick with approach #1. However, as soon as you get a ton of binds in your class constructor, I would recommend you to explore one of the helper libraries mentioned in approach #4.
Other
It's not related to the issue you have, but you shouldn't overuse refs.
Your first inclination may be to use refs to "make things happen" in your app. If this is the case, take a moment and think more critically about where state should be owned in the component hierarchy.
For similar purposes, just like the one you need, using a controlled component is the preferred way. I suggest you to consider using your Component state. So, you can simply access the value like this: this.state.inputContent.
