I had just taken the decision to change as many variables from unsigned
to int
and upon recompiling the code in question, was greeted by this warning m
The reason GCC warns you is because it have pulled of an unsafe optimization. Instead of
for (x = startx; x <= endx; ++x, ++xptr)
it basically uses:
for( x = startx; x < (endx+1); ++x, ++xptr)
which is correct only if endx+1
doesn't overflow, but this happens when endx
is the largest possible value which means that x <= endx
is always true. The compiler assumes that this doesn't happen.
The warning is sometimes a bit confusing because it's not actually the finiteness of the loop that is the point here. I don't know if there's a better candidate for a message that would be short enough for a compiler warning.
One example is the case where for example x
and endx
are integers the optimization could actually be interpreted as being allowed by the standard, if endx==MAX_INT
you would have the condition being true which will lead to that x
eventually overflows which is undefined behavior, this mean that the compiler may assume that this doesn't happen. To skip the loop entirely is a standard conforming behavior according to this interpretations.
Another case is if the program doesn't terminate during the loop or alters volatile memory (ie have observable behavior) which means that an infinite loop means undefined behavior (IIRC, at least the compiler is allowed to assume that this doesn't happen).