Template specialization and derived classes in C++

Question

I have this simple code:

class A{};
class B : public A{};
class C : public B{};

class Test
{
    public:
        template
        void f(T&         


        

Answer 1

Yes, it is possible, but you have to change your code a bit.

First of all, to be technical, the second function f() is not a specialization of the template function, but an overload. When resolving overload, the template version is chosen for all arguments whose type is not A, because it is a perfect match: T is deduced to be equal to the type of the argument, so when calling f(b), for instance, after type deduction the compiler will have to choose between the following two overloads:

void f(B&){printf("template\n");}
void f(A&){printf("specialization\n");}

Of course, the first one is a better match.

Now if you want the second version to be selected when the function is invoked with an argument which is a subclass of A, you have to use some SFINAE technique to prevent the function template from being correctly instantiated when the type T is deduced to be a subclass of A.

You can use std::enable_if in combination with the std::is_base_of type traits to achieve that.

// This will get instantiated only for those T which are not derived from A
template::value
        >::type* = nullptr
    >
void f(T&) { cout << "template" << endl; }

Here is how you would use it in a complete program:

#include 
#include 

using namespace std;

class A{};
class B : public A{};
class C : public B{};
class D {};

class Test
{
    public:

        template::value>::type* = nullptr
            >
        void f(T&) { cout << ("template\n"); }

        void f(A&){ cout << ("non-template\n");}

};

int main()
{
    A a;
    B b;
    C c;
    D d;
    float f;

    Test test;
    test.f(a); // Will print "non-template"
    test.f(b); // Will print "non-template"
    test.f(c); // Will print "non-template"
    test.f(d); // Will print "template"
    test.f(f); // Will print "template"
}

EDIT:

If you are working with a compiler which is not fully compliant with C++11 (and therefore does not support default template arguments on function templates), you might want to change the definition of your template overload of f() as follows:

template
typename enable_if::value, void>::type 
f(T&) { cout << ("template\n"); }

The behavior of the program will be identical. Note that if the return type of f() is void, you can omit the second argument to the enable_if class template.