Preferred alternative
Specify the version range using Ivy notation. Here are some examples copied from this web page:
[1.0, 2.0]
: all versions >= 1.0 and <= 2.0
[1.0, 2.0[
: all versions >= 1.0 and < 2.0
[1.0, )
: all versions >= 1.0 // avoid. Unbound is dangerous!
Troublesome alternative
Use '+' in the major, minor or patch number. This approach has at least two issues:
- If you're building a lib and generating a pom file, the pom will be incompatible with maven, unless you apply some workaround to resolve the version and prevent the pom dependency to use '+' in the version element. See this Gradle github issue.
- The meaning of '+' is prone to confusion. Well, maybe not, but ask around to see if all your peers know exactly the difference between
1.1.+
and 1.1+
in a gradle dependency.
Ideal alternative
Avoid dynamic dependencies (using '+' or version ranges) altogether. Instead, use a fixed version dependency and update the version often with good testing. Here's why:
- In the old days, backwards compatibility was sacred. That's not true anymore. New versions often move/remove/rename classes and functions.
- If your dependency is dynamic (especially with '+' or unbound range), the next build may pick a new version that is incompatible with your project. The incompatibility may be detected only at rutime.
- Version X of your library as built today might be different from version X of your library built tomorrow if one its dependencies is dynamic and a new version is released overnight. This level of uncertainty is not desirable for libraries.