Is there an alternative to “revalue” function from plyr when using dplyr?

后端 未结 4 1599
再見小時候
再見小時候 2021-02-18 15:57

I\'m a fan of the revalue function is plyr for substituting strings. It\'s simple and easy to remember.

However, I\'ve migrated new code to

4条回答
  •  误落风尘
    2021-02-18 16:47

    There is a recode function available starting with dplyr version dplyr_0.5.0 which looks very similar to revalue from plyr.

    Example built from the recode documentation Examples section:

    set.seed(16)
    x = sample(c("a", "b", "c"), 10, replace = TRUE)
    x
     [1] "a" "b" "a" "b" "b" "a" "c" "c" "c" "a"
    
    recode(x, a = "Apple", b = "Bear", c = "Car")
    
       [1] "Car"   "Apple" "Bear"  "Apple" "Car"   "Apple" "Apple" "Car"   "Car"   "Apple"
    

    If you only define some of the values that you want to recode, by default the rest are filled with NA.

    recode(x, a = "Apple", c = "Car")
     [1] "Car"   "Apple" NA      "Apple" "Car"   "Apple" "Apple" "Car"   "Car"   "Apple"
    

    This behavior can be changed using the .default argument.

    recode(x, a = "Apple", c = "Car", .default = x)
     [1] "Car"   "Apple" "b"     "Apple" "Car"   "Apple" "Apple" "Car"   "Car"   "Apple"
    

    There is also a .missing argument if you want to replace missing values with something else.

提交回复
热议问题