Limitations of using C++/CLI with NUnit

Question

This answer to a question about C++ unit test frameworks suggests a possibility that had not occurred to me before: using C++/CLI and NUnit to create unit tests for native C++ c

Answer 1

It works very well and gives you the benefit of having parameterised tests as well as a common test runner and framework if you're in a mixed environment.

There are two downsides, neither of which is serious for most cases:

1. If you're being really picky, the tests are no longer being run in a purely native environment so there's an outside possibility that something may work under test but fail at runtime. I think you'd have to be doing something fairly exotic for this to matter.

2. You rely on your C++ code being able to be included into a C++/CLI program. Sometimes this can have clashes with headers and it forces your code to build OK with UNICODE. In general, this is a good thing as it uncovers crufty bits of code (like inconsistent use of Ansi variants of Win32 calls). Bear in mind that it's only the headers being included so what it may well show is that you are exposing headers at too high a level - some of your includes should probably be within your cpp implementation files.