In sum: I need to write a List Comprehension in which i refer to list that is being created by the List Comprehension.
This might not be something you need to do every d
There used to be a way to do this using the undocumented fact that while the list was being built its value was stored in a local variable named _[1].__self__
. However that quit working in Python 2.7 (maybe earlier, I wasn't paying close attention).
You can do what you want in a single list comprehension if you set up an external data structure first. Since all your pseudo code seemed to be doing with this_list
was checking it to see if each s
was already in it -- i.e. a membership test -- I've changed it into a set
named seen
as an optimization (checking for membership in a list
can be very slow if the list is large). Here's what I mean:
raw_data = [c for c in 'abcdaebfc']
seen = set()
def some_function(s):
seen.add(s)
return s
print [ some_function(s) for s in raw_data if s not in seen ]
# ['a', 'b', 'c', 'd', 'e', 'f']
If you don't have access to some_function
, you could put a call to it in your own wrapper function that added its return value to the seen
set before returning it.
Even though it wouldn't be a list comprehension, I'd encapsulate the whole thing in a function to make reuse easier:
def some_function(s):
# do something with or to 's'...
return s
def add_unique(function, data):
result = []
seen = set(result) # init to empty set
for s in data:
if s not in seen:
t = function(s)
result.append(t)
seen.add(t)
return result
print add_unique(some_function, raw_data)
# ['a', 'b', 'c', 'd', 'e', 'f']
In either case, I find it odd that the list being built in your pseudo code that you want to reference isn't comprised of a subset of raw_data
values, but rather the result of calling some_function
on each of them -- i.e. transformed data -- which naturally makes one wonder what some_function
does such that its return value might match an existing raw_data
item's value.