Opengraph W3C valid?

Question

I would like to know if the opengraph markup is W3C valid, I\'m getting the following error when I try to validate it:

Line 14, Column 17: there is no attribute          


        

Answer 1

With this you are solving the issue:

With this you can use lines in your html like this:

or from other vocabularies listed (http://www.w3.org/2011/rdfa-context/rdfa-1.1) like this one:

cat:        http://www.w3.org/ns/dcat#
qb:         http://purl.org/linked-data/cube#
grddl:      http://www.w3.org/2003/g/data-view#
ma:         http://www.w3.org/ns/ma-ont#
owl:        http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#
rdf:        http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
rdfa:       http://www.w3.org/ns/rdfa#
rdfs:       http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#
rif:        http://www.w3.org/2007/rif#
rr:         http://www.w3.org/ns/r2rml#
skos:       http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#
skosxl:     http://www.w3.org/2008/05/skos-xl#
wdr:        http://www.w3.org/2007/05/powder#
void:       http://rdfs.org/ns/void#
wdrs:       http://www.w3.org/2007/05/powder-s#
xhv:        http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml/vocab#
xml:        http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace
xsd:        http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#
prov:       http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#
sd:         http://www.w3.org/ns/sparql-service-description#
org:        http://www.w3.org/ns/org#
gldp:       http://www.w3.org/ns/people#
cnt:        http://www.w3.org/2008/content#
dcat:       http://www.w3.org/ns/dcat#
earl:       http://www.w3.org/ns/earl#
ht:         http://www.w3.org/2006/http#
ptr:        http://www.w3.org/2009/pointers#
cc:         http://creativecommons.org/ns#
ctag:       http://commontag.org/ns#
dc:         http://purl.org/dc/terms/
dc11:       http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/
dcterms:    http://purl.org/dc/terms/
foaf:       http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/
gr:         http://purl.org/goodrelations/v1#
ical:       http://www.w3.org/2002/12/cal/icaltzd#
og:         http://ogp.me/ns#
rev:        http://purl.org/stuff/rev#
sioc:       http://rdfs.org/sioc/ns#
v:          http://rdf.data-vocabulary.org/#
vcard:      http://www.w3.org/2006/vcard/ns#
schema:     http://schema.org/
describedby:http://www.w3.org/2007/05/powder-s#describedby
license:    http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml/vocab#license
role:       http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml/vocab#role

You can validate it through http://validator.w3.org/ or http://html5.validator.nu/ very well.

So instead of this:

   
   Dell UltraSharp 30" LCD Monitor

You can have this:

   
   Dell UltraSharp 30" LCD Monitor

Some resources http://www.w3.org/TR/rdfa-primer/ http://manu.sporny.org/2012/mythical-differences/ http://rdfa.info/