The problem: I cannot remove a lower order parameter (e.g., a main effects parameter) in a model as long as the higher order parameters (i.e., interactions) rem
I think the most straightforward solution is to use model.matrix
. Possibly, you could achieve what you want with some fancy footwork and custom contrasts. However, if you want "type 3 esque" p-values, You probably want it for every term in your model, in which case, I think my approach with model.matrix
is convenient anyway because you can easily implicitly loop through all models dropping one column at a time. The provision of a possible approach is not an endorsement of the statistical merits of it, but I do think you formulated a clear question and seem to know it may be unsound statistically so I see no reason not to answer it.
## initial data
set.seed(10)
d <- data.frame(
A = rep(c("a1", "a2"), each = 50),
B = c("b1", "b2"),
value = rnorm(100))
options(contrasts=c('contr.sum','contr.poly'))
## create design matrix
X <- model.matrix(~ A * B, data = d)
## fit models dropping one effect at a time
## change from 1:ncol(X) to 2:ncol(X)
## to avoid a no intercept model
m <- lapply(1:ncol(X), function(i) {
lm(value ~ 0 + X[, -i], data = d)
})
## fit (and store) the full model
m$full <- lm(value ~ 0 + X, data = d)
## fit the full model in usual way to compare
## full and regular should be equivalent
m$regular <- lm(value ~ A * B, data = d)
## extract and view coefficients
lapply(m, coef)
This results in this final output:
[[1]]
X[, -i]A1 X[, -i]B1 X[, -i]A1:B1
-0.2047465 -0.1330705 0.1133502
[[2]]
X[, -i](Intercept) X[, -i]B1 X[, -i]A1:B1
-0.1365489 -0.1330705 0.1133502
[[3]]
X[, -i](Intercept) X[, -i]A1 X[, -i]A1:B1
-0.1365489 -0.2047465 0.1133502
[[4]]
X[, -i](Intercept) X[, -i]A1 X[, -i]B1
-0.1365489 -0.2047465 -0.1330705
$full
X(Intercept) XA1 XB1 XA1:B1
-0.1365489 -0.2047465 -0.1330705 0.1133502
$regular
(Intercept) A1 B1 A1:B1
-0.1365489 -0.2047465 -0.1330705 0.1133502
That is nice so far for models using lm
. You mentioned this is ultimately for lmer()
, so here is an example using mixed models. I believe it may become more complex if you have more than a random intercept (i.e., effects need to be dropped from the fixed and random parts of the model).
## mixed example
require(lme4)
## data is a bit trickier
set.seed(10)
mixed <- data.frame(
ID = factor(ID <- rep(seq_along(n <- sample(3:8, 60, TRUE)), n)),
A = sample(c("a1", "a2"), length(ID), TRUE),
B = sample(c("b1", "b2"), length(ID), TRUE),
value = rnorm(length(ID), 3) + rep(rnorm(length(n)), n))
## model matrix as before
X <- model.matrix(~ A * B, data = mixed)
## as before but allowing a random intercept by ID
## becomes trickier if you need to add/drop random effects too
## and I do not show an example of this
mm <- lapply(1:ncol(X), function(i) {
lmer(value ~ 0 + X[, -i] + (1 | ID), data = mixed)
})
## full model
mm$full <- lmer(value ~ 0 + X + (1 | ID), data = mixed)
## full model regular way
mm$regular <- lmer(value ~ A * B + (1 | ID), data = mixed)
## view all the fixed effects
lapply(mm, fixef)
Which gives us...
[[1]]
X[, -i]A1 X[, -i]B1 X[, -i]A1:B1
0.009202554 0.028834041 0.054651770
[[2]]
X[, -i](Intercept) X[, -i]B1 X[, -i]A1:B1
2.83379928 0.03007969 0.05992235
[[3]]
X[, -i](Intercept) X[, -i]A1 X[, -i]A1:B1
2.83317191 0.02058800 0.05862495
[[4]]
X[, -i](Intercept) X[, -i]A1 X[, -i]B1
2.83680235 0.01738798 0.02482256
$full
X(Intercept) XA1 XB1 XA1:B1
2.83440919 0.01947658 0.02928676 0.06057778
$regular
(Intercept) A1 B1 A1:B1
2.83440919 0.01947658 0.02928676 0.06057778