AutoFixture/AutoMoq ignores injected instance/frozen mock

后端 未结 2 1980
自闭症患者
自闭症患者 2021-02-13 18:17

The short takeaway now that the solution has been found:

AutoFixture returns frozen the mock just fine; my sut that was also generated by AutoFixture ju

2条回答
  •  你的背包
    2021-02-13 18:58

    Assuming that the SettingKey property is defined as follows, I can now reproduce the issue:

    public string SettingKey { get; set; }
    

    What happens is that the Test Doubles injected into the SettingMappingXml instance are perfectly fine, but because the SettingKey is writable, AutoFixture's Auto-properties feature kicks in and modifies the value.

    Consider this code:

    var fixture = new Fixture().Customize(new AutoMoqCustomization());
    var sut = fixture.CreateAnonymous();
    Console.WriteLine(sut.SettingKey);
    

    This prints something like this:

    SettingKey83b75965-2886-4308-bcc4-eb0f8e63de09

    Even though all the Test Doubles are properly injected, the expectation in the Setup method isn't met.

    There are many ways to address this issue.

    Protect invariants

    The proper way to resolve this issue is to use the unit test and AutoFixture as a feedback mechanism. This is one of the key points in GOOS: problems with unit tests are often a symptom about a design flaw rather than the fault of the unit test (or AutoFixture) itself.

    In this case it indicates to me that the design isn't fool-proof enough. Is it really appropriate that a client can manipulate the SettingKey at will?

    As a bare minimum, I would recommend an alternative implementation like this:

    public string SettingKey { get; private set; }
    

    With that change, my repro passes.

    Omit SettingKey

    If you can't (or won't) change your design, you can instruct AutoFixture to skip setting the SettingKey property:

    IMappingXml sut = fixture
        .Build()
        .Without(s => s.SettingKey)
        .CreateAnonymous();
    

    Personally, I find it counterproductive to have to write a Build expression every time I need an instance of a particular class. You can decouple how the SettingMappingXml instance are created from the actual instantiation:

    fixture.Customize(
        c => c.Without(s => s.SettingKey));
    IMappingXml sut = fixture.CreateAnonymous();
    

    To take this further, you can encapsulate that Customize method call in a Customization.

    public class SettingMappingXmlCustomization : ICustomization
    {
        public void Customize(IFixture fixture)
        {
            fixture.Customize(
                c => c.Without(s => s.SettingKey));
        }
    }
    

    This requires you to create your Fixture instance with that Customization:

    IFixture fixture = new Fixture()
        .Customize(new SettingMappingXmlCustomization())
        .Customize(new AutoMoqCustomization());
    

    Once you get more than two or three Customizations to chain, you may get tired of writing that method chain all the time. It's time to encapsulate those Customizations into a set of conventions for your particular library:

    public class TestConventions : CompositeCustomization
    {
        public TestConventions()
            : base(
                new SettingMappingXmlCustomization(),
                new AutoMoqCustomization())
        {
        }
    }
    

    This enables you to always create the Fixture instance like this:

    IFixture fixture = new Fixture().Customize(new TestConventions());
    

    The TestConventions gives you a central place where you can go and occasionally modify your conventions for the test suite when you need to do so. It reduces the maintainability tax of your unit tests and helps keep the design of your production code more consistent.

    Finally, since it looks as though you are using xUnit.net, you could utilize AutoFixture's xUnit.net integration, but before you do that you'd need to use a less imperative style of manipulating the Fixture. It turns out that the code which creates, configures and injects the ISettings Test Double is so idiomatic that it has a shortcut called Freeze:

    fixture.Freeze>()
        .Setup(s => s.Get(settingKey)).Returns(xmlString);
    

    With that in place, the next step is to define a custom AutoDataAttribute:

    public class AutoConventionDataAttribute : AutoDataAttribute
    {
        public AutoConventionDataAttribute()
            : base(new Fixture().Customize(new TestConventions()))
        {
        }
    }
    

    You can now reduce the test to the bare essentials, getting rid of all the noise, enabling the test to succinctly express only what matters:

    [Theory, AutoConventionData]
    public void ReducedTheory(
        [Frozen]Mock settingsStub,
        SettingMappingXml sut)
    {
        string xmlString = @"
            
                
                
            ";
        string settingKey = "gcCreditApplicationUsdFieldMappings";
        settingsStub.Setup(s => s.Get(settingKey)).Returns(xmlString);
    
        XElement actualXml = sut.GetXml();
    
        XElement expectedXml = XElement.Parse(xmlString);
        Assert.True(XNode.DeepEquals(expectedXml, actualXml));
    }
    

    Other options

    To make the original test pass, you could also just switch off Auto-properties entirely:

    fixture.OmitAutoProperties = true;
    

提交回复
热议问题