After a few aggregation steps (pipeline steps) in one of my collections, I\'m ending up with the following result:
{
\"_id\" : ObjectId(\"574e7722bffe901713d
As you have guessed, $project
allows you to do that:
db.col.aggregate([
{
$project :
{
_id: "$command._id",
name: "$command.name",
strike: "$command.strike",
duration: "$command.duration"
}
}
]).pretty()
I inserted your previous results and the above query returned this:
{
"_id" : ObjectId("57ec6b6f6c61e919b578fe7c"),
"name" : "Run",
"strike" : 15,
"duration" : 123
}
{
"_id" : ObjectId("573d688d080cc2cbe8aecbbc"),
"name" : "Run",
"strike" : 12,
"duration" : 597
}
So piping your query with this $product
should produce the result you are looking for.
If the exact structure is not your main concern, but rather the exclusion of few fields (wihtout having to list all fields to include), then you may use find()
instead of aggregate()
.
aggregate
's product only lets you exclude _id. This means you need to manually list all fields to include.
Note: Since version 3.4 of MongoDB it is possible to exclude fields in $project
phase (https://docs.mongodb.com/manual/reference/operator/aggregation/project/#exclude-fields)
find
however, lets you list the fields to hide.
(1) You could redirect your aggregate result to another collection using $out :
{ $out : "commands" }
(2) Even though the structure won't be exactly as you'd like, you'll then be able to do a find
query and hide fields:
db.commands.find({}, {_id:0, "command.score":0, eventname:0}).pretty()
It returns this, which is pretty close to what you were looking for:
{
"command" : {
"_id" : ObjectId("57ec6b6f6c61e919b578fe7c"),
"name" : "Run",
"strike" : 15,
"duration" : 123
}
}