Stack overflow when using the System.Net.Sockets.Socket.AcceptAsync model

Question

With respect to C# and .NET\'s System.Net.Sockets.Socket.AcceptAsync method, one would be required to handle a return value of \"false\" in order to handle the immediately avail

Answer 1

newSocket.Send(Encoding.ASCII.GetBytes("Hello socket!")); 
newSocket.Disconnect(false); 
newSocket.Close(); 

The problem with this snippet above is that this will block your next accept operation.

A better way is like this:

while (true)
{
   if (e.SocketError == SocketError.Success)
   {
      //ReadEventArg object user token
      SocketAsyncEventArgs readEventArgs = m_readWritePool.Pop();
      Socket socket = ((AsyncUserToken)readEventArgs.UserToken).Socket = e.AcceptSocket;

      if (!socket.ReceiveAsync(readEventArgs))
         ThreadPool.QueueUserWorkItem(new WaitCallback(ProcessReceiveEx), readEventArgs); .
    }
    else
    {
       HadleBadAccept(e);
    }

    e.AcceptSocket = null;

    m_maxNumberAcceptedClients.WaitOne();
    if (listenSocket.AcceptAsync(e))
       break;
}