Why do people use #ifdef for feature flag tests?

Question

People recommend #ifdef for conditional compilation by a wide margin. A search for #ifdef substantiates that its use is pervasive.

Yet #ifdef NAME (or equi

Answer 1

I cannot speak to why people in general prefer #ifdef over #if, but I can at least say why I do. Based on introspection just now (since you asked -- I've never considered it explicitly before), there are 2 reasons:

1) I prefer my macros (which I try to use sparingly) to have the most straightforward semantics as possible, and correspondingly as "type free" as possible. I assume that macros, if they have any type at all, are either "type free functions" (note: here I would strongly prefer templates, but there are times for everything...) or basically just boolean flags. Hence, even assigning a value of 1 to a macro is stretching it for me. (For example, what should it mean if you have #define _cplusplus 2? Should that be different in any way than 1?)

2) This last bit about them being "flags" goes along with the fact that I mostly use these for things I specify on the command line (or in the IDE) as conditional compilation flags. Indeed, on my software team, when we're writing C++, we're basically "prohibited" from using macros for anything else. And even in the conditional compilation case, we try to avoid them if we can solve the problem some other way (such as via modularity).

Both of these reasons relate to that same underlying assumption that macro use is to be avoided as much as possible (in C++) and so should not need the complexities of types or opaque semantics. If you don't make this assumption (and it's less common when programming in C, I know), then that changes things such that I imagine your points about #if might hold more sway.