Whenever I had to check if the given parameters to a method are not null, I used to write a null check and throw a IllegalArgumentException if the null check fails:
There is a discussion of what kind of exception should be thrown when a method receives a null value it doesn't expect. Some people argue for NullPointerException
, some people argue for IllegalArgumentException
. The JDK way seems to be to throw NullPointerException
in such cases, which is why the Objects.requireNonNull
throws it.
But I wouldn't modify existing code just because of this method, although you might want to consider using Objects.requireNonNull
in new code. (Using it in generally makes code more readable than to check for null and throw an exception manually.)