Over here is the only reason I can find that packages I\'m installing using cabal
are not being found by GHC:
This happens when you install a
Are you using Windows, OS X or some version of Linux? Are you using the Haskell Platform? Have you had a version of ghc
or cabal
before? For a Linux distribution, subtleties about your package manager may come in, of course. (Traces of an old ghc
in particular, and an old ~/.ghc/ directory can be a source of trouble.)
Here are a few elementary thoughts of the type one goes through on #haskell with such problems. (My comprehension is not completely adequate, of course):
The chief question seems to be, Why you were being invited to do what should be local installs with sudo
? A global install (cabal install pony --global
) would of course require privileges if ghc and its libraries are in /usr/...
or some other protected place, but otherwise sudo
vs non-sudo
is independent of the place of installation. What you do with cabal install pony --user
(--user
is the default, in theory) should not require superuser authority. (I have sometimes found on OS X that privileges are requested where the gcc
needs to be called, but this has usually been due to curiosities about my setup.) But in any case sudo
doesn't affect where cabal
is putting them: the implicit --user
and explicit --global
, and more specific incantations for development, do that.
If you do ghc-pkg list
, for example, it will divide the packages into the different places they are registered in according to two or more package.conf.d
directories it is summarizing. On my laptop at the moment these are
/Users/applicative/.ghc/x86_64-darwin-7.0.3/package.conf.d/...
for the local things in ~/.cabal/lib/...
and the protected
/Library/Frameworks/GHC.framework/Versions/7.0.3-x86_64/usr/lib/ghc-7.0.3/package.conf.d
for things that were installed globally with the Haskell Platform installer (this location involves some OS X peculiarities, ghc
, ghci
and so on are in the woods somewhere, but symlinked to /usr/bin
). The conf files for different packages tell you exactly where the libraries were installed. So, for example about the sacred base
library,
$ cat base-4.3.1.0-f5c465200a37a65ca26c5c6c600f6c76.conf
tells me:
import-dirs:
/Library/Frameworks/GHC.framework/Versions/7.0.3-x86_64/usr/lib/ghc-7.0.3/base-4.3.1.0
library-dirs:
/Library/Frameworks/GHC.framework/Versions/7.0.3-x86_64/usr/lib/ghc-7.0.3/base-4.3.1.0
In any case, where does ghc-pkg list
say your cabal install
-ed packages are going? In the ~/.cabal
folder, look at the file config
. If you haven't edited it, I think the commented and uncommented lines, if they state a preference, are stating the defaults for installation with --global
and --user
. In the ~.ghc/
directory check out the subdirectory myghcversion/package.conf.d
and see if anything is there, which should be the same as what ghc-pkg
tells you. (You might study the options for ghc-pkg
in general, eg. ghc-pkg check
and ghc-pkg recache
, if you haven't. You may have installed something in some odd way.)
If you installed ghc
and cabal
and co. by installing the Haskell Platform with a binary installer or your package manager, which seems like a good idea, it is also a good idea, I think, to keep the Platform libraries as something sacred, and make sure you never install anything globally from Hackage; among other things this is likely to have you overwriting Platform libraries -- though this doesn't seem the difficulty here: it would be more obvious if it were.