Recently in my code I have been explicitly writing noexcept(false)
on functions that I know do throw exceptions, mainly for people reading the code. However, I am w
Having no exception-specifier and explicitly stating noexcept(false)
are equivalent, see §15.4/12:
A function with no exception-specification or with an exception-specification of the form
noexcept(constant-expression)
where the constant-expression yieldsfalse
allows all exceptions.
So the compiler should not distinguish between them when considering exceptions.
More importantly, there's no need for you to be tacking on noexcept(false)
to your functions. As a C++ developer, you should assume every function throws by default (which is why the standard takes this stance), so you're adding no new information by writing it out; it's a waste of time for everyone.
Rather, do mark the special case where a function definitely does not throw with noexcept
, and do mark the cases where a function may throw depending on some condition with noexcept(condition)
.
If your function is purposefully the source of some exception E
, write that in your documentation.