If I have something like below, so what does that mean inside synchronized block
synchronised (syncObject) {
Basically, it will me
Basically, it will means only one thread can be inside the above block and as soon as one thread is finished executing, second thread will enter that synchronized block synchronised (syncObject). Right?
Right!
So I need to make this method synchronized or not?
No you don't. Assuming that the method is only going to be called from within the synchronized block in the run()
method, that block will already prevent multiple threads from executing the method simultaneously. So declaring the method to be synchronized
is redundant.
However, I should point out some things:
When you declare an instance method as synchronized
, it will synchronize on this
; i.e. on the Task
object. But your synchronized
block is synchronizing on a different object ... the object in syncObject
. In this case, this doesn't matter. However, if the synchronized
block in the run()
method wasn't there, you would find that the threads were attempting synchronizing on different objects ... and you would NOT get mutual exclusion.
By synchronizing at the top level of the run()
method ... using a single shared syncObject
for all threads that execute that task ... you are effectively making the tasks run one at a time. This completely negates any benefits of using threads.
It is good practice to declare the variable containing a private lock object (such as syncObject
) to be final
. This avoids the possibility that something might overwrite it ... resulting in a synchronization failure.