refactoring LINQ IQueryable expression to remove duplicated portions of queries

Question

I have some linq queries that have redundancy I\'d like to factor out a single piece of code. These are join experssions that are IQueryable, and its important I don\'t cause t

Answer 1

Sorry to answer my own question, but I found a good solution. I think though that depending on what you're trying to do, there are different way to factor out different LINQ expressions without evaluating the IQueryable. So I hope people share alternative solutions.

My solution was to create a "view" for the factored out query. I call it a view because it has a lot in common with a SQL view (from the perspective of a LINQ client). Unlike a SQL view though, it cannot be indexed or have columns persisted. So using this view becomes a bottleneck, it would be appropriate to use an actual SQL view.

static public class MyDataContextExtension
{
    // The view exposes OrderSummary objects
    public class OrderSummary
    {
        public OrderID { get; set; }
        public string FirstProductListed { get; set; }
    }

    static public IQueryable OrderySummaryView(this MyDataContext db)
    {
         return (
              from O in db.Orders
              join OD in db.OrderDetails on O.OrderID equals OD.OrderID into OrderDetails
              let AProductBought = OrderDetails.First().Select(OD => OD.Product.ProductName)
              let TotalCost = OrderDetails.Aggregate(0
              select new OrderSummary()
              {
                  OrderID = OD.OrderID,
                  FirstProductListed = AProductBought.FirstOrDefault()
              };
    }
}

With this, I can factor out the duplicated portion of the query, replacing the original query with the following:

var result = 
from T in db.Transactions
join OS in db.OrderSummaryView() on T.OrderID equals OS.OrderID
select new
{
  TransactionID = T.TransactionID,
  OrderID = T.OrderID,
  FirstProductBought = OS.FirstProductListed
};

You can imagine other columns being added... I think one cool thing is that if you add extra columns but don't use them in your final select, LINQ won't actually query for those things from the database.