Which one of these is faster? Is one \"better\"? Basically I\'ll have two sets and I want to eventually get one match from between the two lists. So really I suppose th
from timeit import timeit
setup = """
from random import sample, shuffle
a = range(100000)
b = sample(a, 1000)
a.reverse()
"""
forin = setup + """
def forin():
# a = set(a)
for obj in b:
if obj in a:
return obj
"""
setin = setup + """
def setin():
# original method:
# return tuple(set(a) & set(b))[0]
# suggested in comment, doesn't change conclusion:
return next(iter(set(a) & set(b)))
"""
print timeit("forin()", forin, number = 100)
print timeit("setin()", setin, number = 100)
Times:
>>>
0.0929054012768
0.637904308732
>>>
0.160845057616
1.08630760484
>>>
0.322059185123
1.10931801261
>>>
0.0758695262169
1.08920981403
>>>
0.247866360526
1.07724461708
>>>
0.301856152688
1.07903130641
Making them into sets in the setup and running 10000 runs instead of 100 yields
>>>
0.000413064976328
0.152831597075
>>>
0.00402408388788
1.49093627898
>>>
0.00394538156695
1.51841512101
>>>
0.00397715579584
1.52581949403
>>>
0.00421472926155
1.53156769646
So your version is much faster whether or not it makes sense to convert them to sets.