I\'ve searched around and found no answer to this question.
I have an app running on Heroku. From my local machine I typically implement and just:
git a
Although you can get some summary information about the branches in the origin
repository using:
git remote show origin
... you do need to fetch the branches from origin
into your repository somehow in order to compare them. This is what git fetch
does. When you run git fetch origin
, it will by default only update the so-called "remote-tracking branches" such as origin/master
. These just store where the corresponding branch was at in origin
the last time you fetched. All your local branches that you've been working on are unaffected by the git fetch
. So, it's safe to do:
git fetch origin
git log -p master..origin/master
... and then if you're happy with that, you can merge from or rebase onto origin/master
.
I would encourage you not to worry about the resources (either disk space or bandwidth) involved in the git fetch origin
command. git efficiently sends just the objects that are necessary to complete the remote-tracking branches that are being updated, and unless you have unusually large files stored with your source code, this shouldn't make much of a difference. In addition, it's frequently useful to have the complete history of the branches from the other repository available even if you don't plan to use them, for example so you can examine that development history.